Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-15 Thread Easton J . W .
gt; Sent: 14 February 2018 22:31:07 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs On 2/14/18 5:28 PM, Easton J.W. wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Many thanks for the detailed reply. > > I just wanted to check that it

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
..@vt.edu> Sent: 14 February 2018 14:43:35 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs On 2/14/18 9:42 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 2/14/18 9:33 AM, Easton J.W. wrote: Thanks Justin, Will this effect the interactions

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Easton J . W .
: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se <gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> Sent: 14 February 2018 14:43:35 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gro

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/14/18 9:42 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 2/14/18 9:33 AM, Easton J.W. wrote: Thanks Justin, Will this effect the interactions (both bonded and non-bonded) that these atoms have, as their atom types are not in the forcefield itp files? Missing atom types would cause grompp to fail;

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se <gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> Sent: 14 February 2018 14:22:11 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Easton J . W .
ers-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu> Sent: 14 February 2018 14:22:11 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs On 2/14/18 7:14 AM, Easton J.W. wrote: > Hi, > &g

Re: [gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/14/18 7:14 AM, Easton J.W. wrote: Hi, I've used acpype to convert my prmtop and inpcrd files into gromacs format. I'm using the amber14sb forcefield. At the top of the top file generated, is an [atomtypes] section. Most of the atoms in this section were present in the atomtypes.atp

[gmx-users] Potential issue using acpype to convert amber topology to gromacs

2018-02-14 Thread Easton J . W .
Hi, I've used acpype to convert my prmtop and inpcrd files into gromacs format. I'm using the amber14sb forcefield. At the top of the top file generated, is an [atomtypes] section. Most of the atoms in this section were present in the atomtypes.atp and ffnonbonded.itp so I deleted them