Re: [gmx-users] Shifting in minimization

2018-05-29 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Sure, that's what trjconv -pbc and -ur are used for. There's no way to ask mdrun to automatically do the particular operation you want. Mark On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:21 PM Alex wrote: > Hi Mark, > Thanks. > The problem is that only the slab shifts and water molecules stay x-y > centrally

Re: [gmx-users] Shifting in minimization

2018-05-29 Thread Alex
Hi Mark, Thanks. The problem is that only the slab shifts and water molecules stay x-y centrally in the box. Similar to the picture in the link below: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TwkgpesJPfFUiqxhl9rXBU33dwWn-tyD Regards, Alex On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > m

Re: [gmx-users] Shifting in minimization

2018-05-25 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, mdrun suits itself because there's no way to guess how to keep everybody happy with the form of the output. You shouldn't need to care, but if you want to put the center of the box somewhere, editconf and trjconv do that. Mark On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:58 PM Alex wrote: > Dear all, > I ha

[gmx-users] Shifting in minimization

2018-05-24 Thread Alex
Dear all, I have system containing a solid slab and water molecules on top of it in a rectangle box ( 6.67350 , 6.96840, 8.68584). I do not know why the whole slab completely shift in the Y direction after minimization!? The shift approximately is equal to the Y-cell size (6.96840). It might not