On 6/1/17 11:02 AM, Erik Marklund wrote:
Hi Mark,
Exactly. But we want to phrase it such that it is legible in the legend if the
file is plotted.
I think we should adjust the help description in a manner like I suggested
before (or more verbose if needed) and perhaps change the legend to
Hi Mark,
Exactly. But we want to phrase it such that it is legible in the legend if the
file is plotted.
Erik
On 1 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Mark Abraham
> wrote:
Hi,
"Pairs within 0.35" has misled David, Justin and I, and doubtless
Yes. The sets have no overlap. But for some reason putting that in a short
description seems difficult :-)
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:31, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I still don't understand your description. Is the third column *additional*
> pairs within 0.35 that
Hi,
I still don't understand your description. Is the third column *additional*
pairs within 0.35 that do not satisfy the angle criterion?
Mark
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:36 PM Erik Marklund
wrote:
>
>
> On 26 May 2017, at 22:12, David van der Spoel
On 5/27/17 2:44 PM, Erik Marklund wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thinking out loud: “Non-Hbonding pairs within 3.5 Å”.
I think it should be more explicit, and exactly what we always tell people:
-num: number of hydrogen bonds as a function of time. The second column
contains the number of atom pairs
Hi Mark,
Thinking out loud: “Non-Hbonding pairs within 3.5 Å”.
Kind regards,
Erik
> On 27 May 2017, at 17:56, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So what should we document in the help text as the meaning, so we don't
> keep having emails about this?
>
> Mark
>
> On
Hi,
So what should we document in the help text as the meaning, so we don't
keep having emails about this?
Mark
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:36 PM Erik Marklund
wrote:
>
>
> On 26 May 2017, at 22:12, David van der Spoel
On 26 May 2017, at 22:12, David van der Spoel
> wrote:
On 26/05/17 22:05, Erik Marklund wrote:
“Pairs within 0.35 nm”. They also don’t fulfil the angle criterion, which is
why they are sometimes fewer than the hbonds.
Therefore I would assume
On 26/05/17 22:05, Erik Marklund wrote:
“Pairs within 0.35 nm”. They also don’t fulfil the angle criterion, which is
why they are sometimes fewer than the hbonds.
Therefore I would assume they are more instead.
Kind regards,
Erik
On 26 May 2017, at 19:38, Adarsh V. K.
“Pairs within 0.35 nm”. They also don’t fulfil the angle criterion, which is
why they are sometimes fewer than the hbonds.
Kind regards,
Erik
> On 26 May 2017, at 19:38, Adarsh V. K. wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The 'gmx hbond' command returns a *.xvg file... viz. "
Dear all,
The 'gmx hbond' command returns a *.xvg file... viz. " hbnum.xvg "
I would like to edit the file before viewing in 'Xmgrace'
I opened the hbnum.xvg using 'gedit'. It shows following details (see below)
Can you please tell me what is there in the third column of the file?
11 matches
Mail list logo