Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints

2014-10-06 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
sjerk Wassenaar > *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users ; > niyaz.sabir > *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2014 1:13 AM > *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints > > Hi Niyaz, > > You can set position restraints for all atoms not in that residue range. > W

Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints

2014-10-06 Thread niyaz.sabir
om: Tsjerk Wassenaar To: Discussion list for GROMACS users ; niyaz.sabir Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 1:13 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints Hi Niyaz, You can set position restraints for all atoms not in that residue range. Whether it makes sense is another que

Re: [gmx-users] constraint and restraints

2014-10-05 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Niyaz, You can set position restraints for all atoms not in that residue range. Whether it makes sense is another question. The dynamics is usually coupled throughout the protein. Cheers, Tsjerk On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:03 PM, niyaz.sabir wrote: > Dear GROMACS users, > Is it possible wit

[gmx-users] constraint and restraints

2014-10-05 Thread niyaz.sabir
Dear GROMACS users, Is it possible with Gromacs and how could be done a simulation keeping almost all protein residues fixed except for instance resi 361-372 ? Will the extraction of resulting rmsd for each residue give some knowledge regarding its flexibility (mobility) ? Regards, N.S. -- Gr