Re: [gmx-users] energy minimisation - LINCS WARNING

2016-10-03 Thread Nash, Anthony
That’s a good suggestion, Mark. Will do :-) Thanks Anthony Dr Anthony Nash Department of Chemistry University College London Skeletal Tissue Dynamics Group Committee member of London Matrix Group @LondonMatrixGrp On 03/10/2016 12:03, "gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se on beh

Re: [gmx-users] energy minimisation - LINCS WARNING

2016-10-03 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Sounds like you could check the output from that tool, and if it gave no warning (or offers you no way to choose another rotamer) then you could make some constructive feedback to its authors :-) Mark On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:22 Nash, Anthony wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > > I’ve tried out all of

Re: [gmx-users] energy minimisation - LINCS WARNING

2016-10-03 Thread Nash, Anthony
Hi Justin, I’ve tried out all of your suggestions, they worked to an extent but the in vacu idea was a good call as it’s actually helped me isolate what the real problem is: I-TASSER has put the C-N backbone bond of two residues through the ring of an adjacent PHE residue! Thanks Anthony On

Re: [gmx-users] energy minimisation - LINCS WARNING

2016-10-02 Thread Justin Lemkul
Please don't reply to digests or unrelated threads when starting a new topic; it creates a mess in the archive. On 10/2/16 6:11 PM, Nash, Anthony wrote: Hi all, I had a homology/de-novo model .pdb converted into .gro, solvated, neutralised and now I¹m going through a series of energy minimis

[gmx-users] energy minimisation - LINCS WARNING

2016-10-02 Thread Nash, Anthony
Hi all, I had a homology/de-novo model .pdb converted into .gro, solvated, neutralised and now I¹m going through a series of energy minimisation steps. Unfortunately, during energy minimisation I get LINCS WARNINGS (angle relative constraint deviation). The the naked eye, the atoms involved don¹t