Re: [gmx-users] potential energy of a system

2017-03-29 Thread Saumyak Mukherjee
Dear Mark and Justin, Thanks a lot for the information On 29 March 2017 at 18:33, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 3/29/17 8:43 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The total potential energy has everything by definition, so I don't know >> what you're asking. >> >> Additivity

Re: [gmx-users] potential energy of a system

2017-03-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/29/17 8:43 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: Hi, The total potential energy has everything by definition, so I don't know what you're asking. Additivity of the components of the potential energy is an artefact of the construction of the model physics. While it is true that different physical

Re: [gmx-users] potential energy of a system

2017-03-29 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, The total potential energy has everything by definition, so I don't know what you're asking. Additivity of the components of the potential energy is an artefact of the construction of the model physics. While it is true that different physical phenomena underlie some of the components, the

[gmx-users] potential energy of a system

2017-03-29 Thread Saumyak Mukherjee
Dear users, Which terms are included in the total potential energy of a system? Does it have COUL-SR and LJ-SR only, or does it also include the 1-4 terms? Thanks in advance. Regards, Saumyak -- *Saumyak Mukherjee* Junior Research Fellow Prof. Biman Bagchi's