Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/27/15 10:35 AM, Daniele Veclani wrote: OK! I got it I created the topology with automated topology builder, and I also optimized the molecule in gaussian, and the charges are similar. Are there other ways to derive the cherges? GROMOS force fields are very empirical. The charge deriv

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Daniele Veclani
OK! I got it I created the topology with automated topology builder, and I also optimized the molecule in gaussian, and the charges are similar. Are there other ways to derive the cherges? D.V. 2015-07-27 16:30 GMT+02:00 Justin Lemkul : > > > On 7/27/15 10:28 AM, Daniele Veclani wrote: > >> Ye

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/27/15 10:28 AM, Daniele Veclani wrote: Yes I have a experimental value. DGexp=1.99 kcal/mol DGcalc.=-14.36 kcal/mol But if I stop the VdW transformation, i get: DGonlyVdW= 2.38 and this value is in line with other data found in the literature. That's only part of the transformation.

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/27/15 10:20 AM, Hannes Loeffler wrote: What happens when you do both transformations simultaneously, i.e. sc-coul=yes? That's not a simultaneous transformation of Coulomb terms, rather sc-coul applies a soft-core to the Coulomb interactions. Actually turning off vdW and Coulomb simul

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Daniele Veclani
Yes I have a experimental value. DGexp=1.99 kcal/mol DGcalc.=-14.36 kcal/mol But if I stop the VdW transformation, i get: DGonlyVdW= 2.38 and this value is in line with other data found in the literature. Thank you for your answer D.V. 2015-07-27 16:08 GMT+02:00 Justin Lemkul : > > > On 7/27/

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Hannes Loeffler
What happens when you do both transformations simultaneously, i.e. sc-coul=yes? On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:55:04 +0200 Daniele Veclani wrote: > I'm trying to calculate the solvation free energy of a molecule (M). > > I have done a VdW. transformation. > > I have done also a electrostatic trans

Re: [gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/27/15 9:55 AM, Daniele Veclani wrote: I'm trying to calculate the solvation free energy of a molecule (M). I have done a VdW. transformation. I have done also a electrostatic transformation. But I get an incorrect value (large overestimation of DG solvation). So presumably you have

[gmx-users] solvation free energy, electrostatic transformation

2015-07-27 Thread Daniele Veclani
I'm trying to calculate the solvation free energy of a molecule (M). I have done a VdW. transformation. I have done also a electrostatic transformation. But I get an incorrect value (large overestimation of DG solvation). I use gromacs 5.0.4 with gromos 54a7 force fields and my .mdp file (for