On Oct 2, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Russ White wrote:
>>>
>>> - Path information is lost. While this doesn't impact loop prevention, this
>>> information is operationally useful.
>>
>> +1. Reachability data optimisation is highly desirable and may one day be
>> necessary, but this is one of the wro
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Russ White wrote:
>> - Path information is lost. While this doesn't impact loop prevention, this
>> information is operationally useful. I'll offer the counter that this is
>> already done today through explicit policy, typically either because the
>> operat
>> - Path information is lost. While this doesn't impact loop prevention, this
>> information is operationally useful.
>
> +1. Reachability data optimisation is highly desirable and may one day be
> necessary, but this is one of the wrong places to do it.
Again, I'm a bit baffled. Can you ex
I haven't been keeping up on email very well, but...
> - Path information is lost. While this doesn't impact loop prevention, this
> information is operationally useful. I'll offer the counter that this is
> already done today through explicit policy, typically either because the
> operat
