On May 19, 2014, at 9:12 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
>
> Where else would it be documented? If the IETF is designing protocols that
> operators will have to deploy, should this not be here? I thought that was
> the point of an “operations” working group?
Not all operational practices are do
Where else would it be documented? If the IETF is designing protocols that
operators will have to deploy, should this not be here? I thought that was the
point of an “operations” working group?
-danny
On May 19, 2014, at 9:11 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Is there a need for this to be explicit
On May 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
> Good point Sandy, this was definitely meant to serve as more of a motivation,
> illustrating a real problem that smart people should focus on because it
> happens all the time and some real heavy solutions being consider wholly
> ignore it
[top post only]
Good point Sandy, this was definitely meant to serve as more of a motivation,
illustrating a real problem that smart people should focus on because it
happens all the time and some real heavy solutions being consider wholly ignore
it. Quibbling about “definitions” that satisfy
