From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent:
Friday, June 26, 2015 12:23 AM
hi pierre
I have the feeling you represent the general opinion on this.
in theory, with brownian motion, all the molecules of are can end up in one
corner of the room. it's just
Hi Jeffrey et all,
On 15 Jun 2015, at 21:30, Jeffrey Haas jh...@pfrc.org wrote:
…
I'm generally supportive of this draft. The Security Considerations cover
the majority of the issues this standardized blackhole community introduces.
Thanks for your feedback.
I would suggest one
Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:50:36PM +, Thomas King wrote:
I added the following text to the draft:
The presence of this BLACKHOLEIXP BGP community may introduce a resource
exhaustion attack to BGP speakers. If a BGP speaker receives many IP prefixes
containing the BLACKHOLE BGP
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:27:23PM +, Thomas King wrote:
so, do you propose that the IXP RS MUST add a NO_EXPORT to the route that
passed the IRR filters and which is requested to be blackholed?
This is completely fine with me.
Or NO_ADVERTISE, if appropriate.
I'm wondering if people
