Updated the agenda to slide Sriram's talk to the end, hopefully Susan will
be able to do her meeting start and jump to grow for the relevant parts of
conversation she's interested here :)
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Susan Hares wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Sue
>
>
>
> *From:*
On 11/13/16 8:12 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> joel jaeggli wrote:
>> The case where routine maintance creates temporary blackholes is
>> basically ubiquitious were you attempting to use urp strict.
>
> oh indeed - I've been at the receiving end of exactly this type of
> blackholing. Very annoying.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 13, Marco Marzetti wrote:
>
>> Carriers cannot do that as they cannot drop ALL the traffic from a
>> certain source if the request is not coming from the owner.
> They may want to do this for policy
On Nov 13, Marco Marzetti wrote:
> Carriers cannot do that as they cannot drop ALL the traffic from a
> certain source if the request is not coming from the owner.
They may want to do this for policy reasons, usually because malicious
traffic is being sourced and the customer
joel jaeggli wrote:
> The case where routine maintance creates temporary blackholes is
> basically ubiquitious were you attempting to use urp strict.
oh indeed - I've been at the receiving end of exactly this type of
blackholing. Very annoying. But I just wonder if urpf is the best tool
to