Re: [GROW] Handling of LAGs in Mitigating Negative Impact of Maintenance through BGP Session Culling

2018-01-17 Thread joel jaeggli
On 1/17/18 18:56, Randy Bush wrote: > really do not want to get drawn into this. but while looking into lags > a few years back, we found a lot of them split across line cards, with > resilience to line card failure being the stated reason. even in fixed configuration 1 and 2ru switches you may s

Re: [GROW] Handling of LAGs in Mitigating Negative Impact of Maintenance through BGP Session Culling

2018-01-17 Thread Randy Bush
really do not want to get drawn into this. but while looking into lags a few years back, we found a lot of them split across line cards, with resilience to line card failure being the stated reason. randy ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www

Re: [GROW] Handling of LAGs in Mitigating Negative Impact of Maintenance through BGP Session Culling

2018-01-17 Thread Thomas King
Thanks for the feedback! Let’s move ahead. Thomas On 16.01.18, 22:36, "Gert Doering" wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:40:16PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote: > I wouldn't see a problem mentioning LAGs in a future -bis, but as others > have noted, there doesn't seem to be a