LGTM. No issues with waving this through with minimal bureaucracy.
Nick
Christopher Morrow wrote on 20/09/2018 21:33:
Hello Grow Folks,
This seems like a sane plan ... I or Job can either unilaterally accept
this, or ask for adoption...
If there's enough immediate call to avoid the 2wk call
Hello Grow Folks,
This seems like a sane plan ... I or Job can either unilaterally accept
this, or ask for adoption...
If there's enough immediate call to avoid the 2wk call for adoption I'd be
happy to just put it on the docket...
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:12 AM John Scudder wrote:
> Hi All,
I would also support adoption on the part of the WG if the chairs were to ask
for it.
Jared Mauch
On Sep 20, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> A while ago we talked about this. I finally wrote a draft for it,
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-scudder-grow-bmp-registries-change-00.txt:
>>
> A while ago we talked about this. I finally wrote a draft for it,
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-scudder-grow-bmp-registries-change-00.txt:
>
> Abstract
>
>This document updates RFC 7854, BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) by
>making a change to the registration procedures for several
>
Hi All,
A while ago we talked about this. I finally wrote a draft for it,
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-scudder-grow-bmp-registries-change-00.txt:
Abstract
This document updates RFC 7854, BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) by
making a change to the registration procedures for several
regist
