One further thought to this:
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 6:40 PM, John Scudder wrote:
>
> Issue 1. draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib says:
> This doesn't make sense to me, since the definition of reason 2 in RFC 7854
> section 4.9 doesn't allow for any extra data:
> An alternate fix, somewhat m
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
>
> Wait, a BMP server is not a BGP peer. It does not replicate a routing table.
> It is a logger/processor of information. It doesn't "delete" older
> information,
> just because some newer information arrived.
> Its purpose it to te
Tim,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:19:30AM +, Tim Evens (tievens) wrote:
> NOTE: Sorry for the delay... end of year commitments are pressing...
> Addressing these comments in descending order.
I know this feeling well. :-)
> [tievens] Per this draft, the BGP-ID and ASN are set to the global/d
