Re: [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested

2019-09-26 Thread Jeffrey Haas
> On Sep 26, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > This is nice, but what would make it more useful would be if it also > reported if there are *useful* AS_SETS / if the AS_SET means anything. > > For example, from Jared's email below: > AS path: 14061 3356 6762 23487 27738 27738 27738 2

Re: [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested

2019-09-26 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:32 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote: > > Jared, > > >(Obviously my search in e-mail today went afoul, I see it’s adopted.. > > Yes, the draft was adopted. You can see the discussion here: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/?gbt=1&q=WG%20adoption%20for%20dr

Re: [GROW] Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET -- feedback requested

2019-09-26 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 11:32 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) > wrote: > > Jared, > >> (Obviously my search in e-mail today went afoul, I see it’s adopted.. > > Yes, the draft was adopted. You can see the discussion here: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/?gbt=1&q=WG%20adoption%20