Dear GROW working group,
I read and support the draft-lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit adoption.
The support of vendor-specific TLVs in the BMP application enables the
development of new BMP extensions the same way as enterprise-specific
Information Elements did in IPFIX. Therefore I agree with the au
Folks,
During our last meeting Camilo gave a presentation on:
draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang
I believe the authors' intention was to gauge whether or not the WG wanted
to adopt this work item? So:
1) Was that the intent?
2) Did the group also understand that to be the case?
3) if 1 and 2 I'll kic
Hi GROW,
At the IETF 113 GROW session Paolo asked whether this working group
could consider adoption for draft-lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit.
This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
internet-draft should be adopted.
Title:
Support for Enterprise-specific TLVs in the BG
