Max,
> On Jul 5, 2022, at 6:40 AM, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> after some discussion at RIPE84 we took the time to formalize a draft
> to define a well-known BGP community to indicate a given prefix is
> carrying Anycast traffic. The intent is to allow ISPs to do well
> informed TE, especially i
Dear all,
The call for working group adoption ended some time ago, it seems
numerous people are in favor of progressing this work in the GROW
working group.
Authors - please resubmit this draft as 'draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit'
Kind regards,
Job
GROW co-chair
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 04:19:19PM
Hi Max,
Thank you for publishing this draft. I have few questions after reading it.
1. If I have /24 and I advertise it over N peerings N>1 to my ISP from my
DMZ does it automatically become ANYCAST prefix ?
1a. Note that I may have just one real host route in this /24 which I
consider a true an
Dear Max,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> after some discussion at RIPE84 we took the time to formalize a draft
> to define a well-known BGP community to indicate a given prefix is
> carrying Anycast traffic. The intent is to allow ISPs to do well
> informed T
Hey folks,
after some discussion at RIPE84 we took the time to formalize a draft
to define a well-known BGP community to indicate a given prefix is
carrying Anycast traffic. The intent is to allow ISPs to do well
informed TE, especially in cases where they want to diverge from the
hot potato prin
