Jakob,
Thanks. I was expecting this question. We will work on a recursive path
analysis to answer it. Brian's suggestion also will be considered. The data
crunching may take a week or so.
My hunch was that when the AS path length is 5 or 6 or more, the ASes at the
far end (most recently added)
When the collector sees a route with AS-PATH length 5 with a community on it,
that does not imply that the community traveled through 5 AS hops. The
community could have been added at any of the ASes in the path. Where does the
data show that any communities transited any AS boundaries?
Regards
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:06 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> There may be a knob that AS operators have for permitting transitivity,
> but we need to look at measurements to understand whether or not operators
> actually allow transitivity to EC and LC.
>
> NI
There may be a knob that AS operators have for permitting transitivity, but we
need to look at measurements to understand whether or not operators actually
allow transitivity to EC and LC.
NIST BGP measurements (thanks to my colleague Lilia Hannachi) were shared on
the GROW list in May 2020:
ht
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:11 AM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> [Note, commenting as an individual contributor...]
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:10:08PM -0700, Brian Dickson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:57 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
> > kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> > > We (authors of
Brian,
>We would like to continue proceeding with use of a LC range for
>implementation, using a single (or small number) of Global Administrator
>values.
I should have clarified. I am not opposed to staying on course with a WKLC
based solution. I only thought transitivity readily came with Tr
[Note, commenting as an individual contributor...]
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:10:08PM -0700, Brian Dickson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:57 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
> kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> > We (authors of the WKLC draft) can continue working on creating an IANA
> > WK
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:57 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> Hi Sue,
>
> Thanks for the detailed thoughts you have shared on the IDR list about the
> WKLC draft and route leaks solution draft (while also responding to Brian’s
> post).
>
> At one point in the
Hi Sue,
Thanks for the detailed thoughts you have shared on the IDR list about the WKLC
draft and route leaks solution draft (while also responding to Brian’s post).
At one point in the past, the route leaks solution needed 8 bytes of user data
space to accommodate two ASNs but then there was a
