Hi Job,
Please let us know if there is anything needed to help progress this draft.
Thanks,
mike
From: GROW On Behalf Of Michael McBride
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 11:20 PM
To: David Farmer
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
, February 7, 2024 7:21 AM
To: Michael McBride
Cc: grow@ietf.org; Job Snijders
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Also, the links to the articles "Geoff Huston's Path Prepending in BGP" and
"Excessive AS Path Prepending" should be
Also, the links to the articles "Geoff Huston's Path Prepending in BGP" and
"Excessive AS Path Prepending" should be informational references instead
of embedded links.
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:13 AM David Farmer wrote:
> Speaking of informational references, all the references are norma
Speaking of informational references, all the references are normative.
That doesn't seem correct. The references to RFC 5398, RFC 5738, and RFC
8195 seem to be informational references, in my opinion.
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:03 AM David Farmer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:54 AM Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:11:12PM -0600, David Farmer wrote:
> > If you keep it as updating RFC 7454, I believe you need to say it does
> > so in the abstract. Also, somewhere in the document, probably in the
> > introduction, you need to expl
Wednesday, February 7, 2024 5:55 AM
To: David Farmer
Cc: Michael McBride ; grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:11:12PM -0600, David Farmer wrote:
> If you keep it as updating RFC 7454, I believe you need to say it
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:11:12PM -0600, David Farmer wrote:
> If you keep it as updating RFC 7454, I believe you need to say it does
> so in the abstract. Also, somewhere in the document, probably in the
> introduction, you need to explain how it updates RFC 7454, that is how
> this document rela
o:* Michael McBride
> *Cc:* Job Snijders ; grow@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [GROW] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
>
>
>
> In looking at RFC 7454, I would argue that this document updates RFC 7454
> by expanding and providing detail to the recommendation &qu
Great thank you David. I kept 7454 in the updates and made the other changes.
New version now posted.
mike
From: David Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:34 PM
To: Michael McBride
Cc: Job Snijders ; grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
>
> mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Job Snijders
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 12:38 PM
> *To:* Michael McBride
> *Cc:* grow@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [GROW] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
>
>
>
> Dear Michael,
>
>
&
Sounds good, I'll remove the updates and submit a new version tonight.
mike
From: Job Snijders
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 12:38 PM
To: Michael McBride
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Dear Michael,
Perhaps a question was
t doesn't
> make sense.
>
> Thanks,
> mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Job Snijders
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 11:13 AM
> To: Michael McBride
> Cc: grow@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
>
Thanks,
mike
-Original Message-
From: Job Snijders
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 11:13 AM
To: Michael McBride
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Dear Michael,
Before we proceed, can you clarify how exactly
draft-ietf-grow-as-path
On Behalf Of Michael McBride
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 11:21 PM
> To: Martin Pels ; grow@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I just submitted a new version to address your (and Alejandro's) comm
Bride
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 11:21 PM
To: Martin Pels ; grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Hi Martin,
I just submitted a new version to address your (and Alejandro's) comments. See
my comments in line (MM):
-Original Message-
Hi Martin,
I just submitted a new version to address your (and Alejandro's) comments. See
my comments in line (MM):
-Original Message-
From: GROW On Behalf Of Martin Pels
Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 1:00 AM
To: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as
ubject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Hi,
Some comments
-
Section 3.1 and 4:
As has been mentioned before on this list, I think using the term "route leak"
in this scenario is confusing. Something like "suboptimal" or "uninten
Hi,
Some comments
-
Section 3.1 and 4:
As has been mentioned before on this list, I think using the term "route
leak" in this scenario is confusing. Something like "suboptimal" or
"unintended" routing would be a better fit.
3.2 and 3.3:
These do not appear to be separate problems
lf Of Alejandro Acosta
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2024 12:07 PM
To: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt
Hello All,
One more comment on this draft.
On section 5, in "Best Practices" I think one item could be added "Do not
prepe
Hello All,
One more comment on this draft.
On section 5, in "Best Practices" I think one item could be added "Do
not prepend if you are single home"
That's it.
Alejandro,
On 28/12/23 5:56 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt is
Hello,
Sorry to participate in this draft so late, my apologies.
I support the draft and looking forward to have a formal document
addressing as-prepending.
My small comment, maybe a litte bit crazy idea; after reading the
document and going thru the discussion in the mailing list, I w
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending-09.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF.
Title: AS Path Prepending
Authors: Mike McBride
Doug Madory
Jeff Tantsura
Robert Raszuk
Hongw
22 matches
Mail list logo
