Re: [GROW] Timestamp question on RFC 7854

2019-05-22 Thread Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)
] Timestamp question on RFC 7854 I don't think this is a typo - all looks fine. It all get's a bit more clear if you just look at NTP definition: NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit fixed-point number, in seconds relative to UT on 1 January 1900. The integer part is in

Re: [GROW] Timestamp question on RFC 7854

2019-05-22 Thread Robert Raszuk
I don't think this is a typo - all looks fine. It all get's a bit more clear if you just look at NTP definition: NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit fixed-point number, in seconds relative to UT on 1 January 1900. The integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction pa

[GROW] Timestamp question on RFC 7854

2019-05-22 Thread Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)
Dear authors, A maybe silly timestamp question on RFC7854. It is specified in Section 4.2: Timestamp: The time when the encapsulated routes were received (one may also think of this as the time when they were installed in the Adj-RIB-In), expressed in seconds and microseconds since