Re: [GROW] Value of timestamps in BMP header for local-rib monitoring

Hi Jared, We had a brief conversation. To confirm we went for #2, yes: https://github.com/TimEvens/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-loc-rib/blob/master/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib.txt#L495-L499 Paolo On 19 Jun 2019, at 14:41, Jared Mauch mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net>> wrote: On Jun 13, 2019, at 12:02

Re: [GROW] Value of timestamps in BMP header for local-rib monitoring

> On Jun 13, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > > Thanks Mukul. I'll also update this one as noted. Tim, Sorry, are you saying you’re updating it to proposal #1 or #2 ? (I would want #2) - Jared > > On 6/13/19, 8:16 AM, "GROW on behalf of Mukul Srivastava" > wrote: > >

Re: [GROW] Value of timestamps in BMP header for local-rib monitoring

Thanks Mukul. I'll also update this one as noted. On 6/13/19, 8:16 AM, "GROW on behalf of Mukul Srivastava" mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of msri=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Hi All The current BMP Local-RIb draft doesn’t define what

Re: [GROW] Value of timestamps in BMP header for local-rib monitoring

This also makes sense to me. Thanks, —John On Jun 13, 2019, at 11:16 AM, Mukul Srivastava mailto:m...@juniper.net>> wrote: Hi All The current BMP Local-RIb draft doesn’t define what timestamp should be used in Per-Peer header for BMP local RIB monitoring. BMP RFC 7854 defines “Timestamp” in

[GROW] Value of timestamps in BMP header for local-rib monitoring

Hi All The current BMP Local-RIb draft doesn’t define what timestamp should be used in Per-Peer header for BMP local RIB monitoring. BMP RFC 7854 defines “Timestamp” in Per-Peer header as below: Timestamp: The time when the encapsulated routes were received(one may also think of this as the ti