Re: [GROW] The automatic policy exchange by draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt can be used for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis

2020-07-27 Thread Robert Raszuk
If people still think of adding p2p config push to the protocol which allows all of us to function - by all means the answer to your question is YES. Thx, R. On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:21 AM Linda Dunbar wrote: > Robert, > > > > Thank you very much for the explanation. > > “new BGP Transport

Re: [GROW] The automatic policy exchange by draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt can be used for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis

2020-07-26 Thread Linda Dunbar
Robert, Thank you very much for the explanation. “new BGP Transport Instance with new separate port and separate process”, very interesting perspective. But draft-raszuk-ti-bgp-01 was written 10 years ago. Is it still valid and worth pursuing? Thank you Linda From: Robert Raszuk Sent:

Re: [GROW] The automatic policy exchange by draft-ietf-idr-rpd-05.txt can be used for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis

2020-07-26 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Linda, So are you suggesting that this new SAFI is to be sent on EBGP too ?? Whow Note BGP is not too secure transport ! I would never allow any peer to push me policy via eBGP to my ASBRs regardless how much I would trust it. That aside I think no one is questioning that overall this is