With the recent launch of grpc-python 1.15.0 version fork method has been
enabled with GRPC_ENABLE_FORK_SUPPORT=1 flag, to achieve parallelism. Is
there any tutorial/example explaining how to make use of it ? (We have been
using single thread approach until now, as performance was degrading
Thanks for the insight!
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 2:08:53 PM UTC-4, Muxi Yan wrote:
>
> A new connection will be created if (and only if) the channel arguments
> are different; otherwise the same connection will be reused.
>
> On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 8:02:07 AM UTC-7,
Thanks for the response! I am using the async Write. There is no status
returned in the call to Write itself. The Next call to the completion queue
has no status indication as well, except for the success/failure boolean
value.
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 2:05:44 PM UTC-4, Muxi Yan
Discussion thread for gRFC L39: https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/106
This gRFC proposes to delete the grpc_use_signal function from the core
surface API, as it is no longer useful (gRPC no longer uses signals
internally).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Discussion thread for gRFC L40: https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/107
This gRFC proposes a new Client option for modifying how calls are invoked.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
A new connection will be created if (and only if) the channel arguments are
different; otherwise the same connection will be reused.
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 8:02:07 AM UTC-7, grpc_client wrote:
>
> *Language*: C++
> *gRPC version*: 1.2.5
> *Role*: gRPC client
>
> A quick question
AFAIK the error detail should be included in the returned status of the
call.
On Thursday, September 20, 2018 at 7:22:49 AM UTC-7, dataman wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on an async gRPC client in C++. Due to server limitations we
> need to cap the max send msg size in the client. When
Re: context
I'm not clear on what the bug is at this point, or if there is one. If I
understand, the issues encountered here were while attempting to reproduce
a suspected bug?
Re: SETTING UP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
I'm actually surprised that your invocation of "python
Hi mauricio :
I'm also using c++ version of gRPC 1.8.x. And I didn't encounter your
problem. I spawned 3 instance of server which sleep 3s/1s/1s
respectively, and the client start requesting in an asynchronous manner,
received response from the last two instances after 1 second , then
received
Hi,
I have the same question. How do I know the messages have delivered to the
server side?
The client can get and store all messages in the interceptor. However I
can't get any error if the connection has any problem.
Observer.onError can't get any information about sent messages.
On
10 matches
Mail list logo