Re: [grpc-io] Differences/considerations between server implementations?

2017-04-25 Thread suicas
Thanks, that's a very good point, there seem to be a lot more examples of Go services to look at. On Monday, 24 April 2017 17:05:34 UTC+1, Eric Anderson wrote: > > Use the language that fits your use-case best. The only language that is > "special" is C++, because it is being optimized to a leve

Re: [grpc-io] Differences/considerations between server implementations?

2017-04-24 Thread 'Eric Anderson' via grpc.io
Use the language that fits your use-case best. The only language that is "special" is C++, because it is being optimized to a level beyond most other languages, but at a cost of being harder to use to get all that performance. Python, Java, and Go each use a different stack (Python uses the C stack

[grpc-io] Differences/considerations between server implementations?

2017-04-21 Thread suicas
Just starting to look at using gRPC, and quite impressed so far. I'm wondering if there are any major differences between implementations across different languages when choosing which to use as the gRPC service itself? E.g. do they all have feature parity, are some considered more tested or p