OK thanks. We will work around it in the application layer.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:54 PM Qi Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Arya Asemanfar <
> arya.aseman...@mixpanel.com> wrote:
>
> Since a TCP load balancer is only aware of TCP packets and not HTTP2
> frames,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Arya Asemanfar
wrote:
> Since a TCP load balancer is only aware of TCP packets and not HTTP2
> frames, it cannot multiplex requests from multiple clients onto 1
> connection. A TCP load balancer makes a load balancing decision at
>
Since a TCP load balancer is only aware of TCP packets and not HTTP2
frames, it cannot multiplex requests from multiple clients onto 1
connection. A TCP load balancer makes a load balancing decision at
connection establishment, not per stream, request, or packet.
Re calling Close after a timer
I am not clear how the TCP load balancer works. Is it a TCP proxy which
forwards the traffic from the client? If yes, your description is still
confusing to me because there should be 100 connections from the clients to
the TCP proxy and 10 connections from the TCP proxy to the servers. Then I
am
Scenario A, and when I said "restarting server" I mean grpc server.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:59 PM Qi Zhao wrote:
> I am still confused. The scenario you want to serve as an example is
> a) grpc clients --> TCP LB --> grpc servers;
> or
> b) grpc clients --> grpc servers?
>
>
I am still confused. The scenario you want to serve as an example is
a) grpc clients --> TCP LB --> grpc servers;
or
b) grpc clients --> grpc servers?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Arya Asemanfar
wrote:
> Sorry, I meant grpc server. Yes you are right if the TCP
Sorry, I meant grpc server. Yes you are right if the TCP load balancer
restarts there is no problem, so my scenario only applies if the grpc
server restarts.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:17 PM Qi Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Arya Asemanfar <
>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Arya Asemanfar wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. Good idea re metadata for getting the Balancer to
> treat the connections as different. Will take a look at that.
>
> Some clarifications/questions inline:
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at
Thanks for the feedback. Good idea re metadata for getting the Balancer to
treat the connections as different. Will take a look at that.
Some clarifications/questions inline:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:11 AM, 'Qi Zhao' via grpc.io <
grpc-io@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. My
Hey all,
We're considering implementing some patches to the golang grpc
implementation. These are things we think would better fit inside of grpc
rather than trying to achieve from outside. Before we go through the
effort, we'd like to gauge whether these features would be welcome
(assuming
10 matches
Mail list logo