Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Cyril,
> yes I am a Solaris developer. [Open]Solaris x86 uses grub legacy to boot.
> And our plans for Polaris involve using GRUB2 in order to reuse as much
> code as possible. Multiboot naturally is a part of the game. And extending
> it to PPC arch i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
>
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then b
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
> >> on PowerPC without issue now ?
> >>
> >
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I just committed the regenerated powerpc-ieee1275.mk to CVS.
>> >
>>
>> Does this mean that I can pull a new download from CVS and then build
>> on PowerPC without issue now ?
>>
>
> Should work [it did for me :) on Peg with Gentoo]
How does it work f
Joe Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>
>>* Add support for x86_64.
>>
>
> I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
> and if so, why?
It does. And the reason is that it works like that for me. My
question: why not?
At the moment GR
On 10/16/05, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:.
>* Add support for x86_64.
>
I am curious if support for x86_64 still uses -m32 in the build process,
and if so, why?
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On 10/16/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > > me,
> > > but I am not sure I didn't miss something i
On 10/16/05, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for
> > me,
> > but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
>
> Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-iee
On Oct 15, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
Thanks for your help. Right now I've gotten to the point where I can
print ``hello world'' and exit back to OpenFirmware.
It is interesting though that I cannot ``boot'' it again (or for that
matter launch BootX and procede back into OS X) un
Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apparently sfs addition breaks PPC build. The attached patch fixed it for me,
> but I am not sure I didn't miss something important.
Right. I committed a patch that changed powerpc-ieee1275.rmk, but it
seems that powerpc-ieee1275.mk was not regenerated.
On Saturday 15 Oct 2005 18:34, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 10:07 am, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > Problem 2: Reading gzip files all at once results in corruption of the
> > > data. It can be exposed by this patch:
> >
> > Can you investigate this problem?
The patch f
13 matches
Mail list logo
