Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Alex,
[...]
Do we want to be able to boot the computer from GRUB2 installed on a
medium (whatever it may be), then be able to boot from a CD (in
whatever mode - emulation or no emulation)?
Yes.
Do we also want to be able to boot the computer
adrian15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached you will find the patch adding test -e support for grub2.
This is my first patch. I have compiled it without no errors.
Urgh... I thought/hoped I told you I had a test.c rewrite sitting on
my harddisk? Or did I tell Robert to poke me until next
adrian15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GRUB_MOD_INIT(test)
{
(void)mod;/* To stop warning. */
grub_register_command ([, grub_cmd_test, GRUB_COMMAND_FLAG_CMDLINE,
[ EXPRESSION ], Evaluate an expression, 0);
grub_register_command (test,
On 04/06/07, Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:10:53 +0200,
Marco Gerards wrote:
Alex Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I think both are important to support, but I want to see
what the majority of developers and users think we should support.
Just
A pair of things I found when debugging powerpc issues. Let me know what
you think (context comment follows).
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
diff -ur
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:00:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
- struct grub_pc_partition *pcdata = 0;
+ struct grub_pc_partition *pcdata = NULL;
[...]
- char *drive_name = 0;
+ char *drive_name = NULL;
I generaly find that NULL makes it clearer for pointers, do you have a
At Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:37:25 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
Here's another report with issues about LVM. I notice the device name is
different than previous ones (note: device.map only has /dev/sda).
The problem seems to be that grub-install is probing for things
outside of /boot. GRUB shouldn't
At Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:30:12 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:11:30PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
At Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:37:25 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
Here's another report with issues about LVM. I notice the device name is
different than previous ones (note:
