At Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:38:14 -0400,
Alex Roman wrote:
>
> Sorry, what do you mean by busy waiting?
Busy waiting is looping while checking whether a condition
changed. E.g.
while(condition_is_true());
It would be nicer to let the processor sleep for a while. I'm not sure
whether we can actually
- Original message -
"Alex Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, Not yet...
Sorry, what do you mean by busy waiting?
Thanks
Alex
On 22/07/07, Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Alex Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Is there any mechanism to wait/sleep for a specified time i
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:10:52PM +0200, Rober
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:18:23PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>
> What is the status? Does it work with every NTFS filesystem around?
I've tested it with NTFSes made by win2k, winxp and vista. They all work.
(only did basic tests: directory listing and cating small files)
--
Robert Millan
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:21:18PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> The code already uses an AST. Or what do you mean?
I mean the test program.
> If I am not mistaken, you are going over parser.y to make it work with
> more situations and to introduce proper error handling. Or am I
> mistaken?
Th
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:06:49PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> You are right that it has advantages. But I prefer using an Abstract
>> Syntax Tree. It is used a lot in most literature on parsers, clean
>> and easy to understand.
>>
>> The disadvantage is th
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:06:49PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> You are right that it has advantages. But I prefer using an Abstract
> Syntax Tree. It is used a lot in most literature on parsers, clean
> and easy to understand.
>
> The disadvantage is that you need a separate free routine for e
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:56:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:04:34AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > will make a new release in next weekend, if everything looks good.
> >
> > I d
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:10:52PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > > What naming/numbering scheme does this follow when
"Ashok kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Well, if people want to work on scripting or networking they should
>> talk to me. I have lots of code on my hd that is incomplete or just
>> not cleaned up. It would be a waste of time if it were rewritten.
>> And please poke me a lot to get m
Hi,
Long time ago I mentioned that I was working on networking. The best
way to continue from now on is to get my code into CVS ASAP. That way
other people (and quite some people showed their interest) can work on
this.
Here is the first batch of code. This code adds support for managing
the f
On 7/23/07, adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that if grub2 is going to have scripting and so many new
features we should take advantage of them and change the way computers
do boot.
#1) All Linux installers should set or reuse a ext2 partition next to
the windows one as a /boot one w
Hello!
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:04:34AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > will make a new release in next weekend, if everything looks good.
>
> I don't think we're ready. There are serious outstanding issues on LVM and
> powe
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Would be nice if we could start using a BTS for grub2 issues. Is the Savannah
> one suitable? Is it possible to have a separate cathegory for grub2 bugs?
There was a discussion about this before in de thread "Status updates
for grub 2 development
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> i have a nice question for you :)
> in many acer laptops there is a second poweron button which is called "arcade
> button".
> this is a normal power on button, as you can see:
>
> # more /proc/bus/input/devices
> I: Bus=0019 Vendor= Prod
"Alex Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Is there any mechanism to wait/sleep for a specified time in GRUB?
Not yet. I will also need this for networking. Actually, we can do
still in this idle time. I will get back on this.
You can read the time in milliseconds, IIRC. You can use tha
"Alex Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I assume all future patches will need to have their copyright
> notices changed, correct?
Yes.
--
Marco
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Erich Boleyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Erich,
> I've been becoming more interested (and having some more time) to look
> seriously into GRUB development again, and have been following the email
> list for a bit. I've been working at AMD in CPU architecture/instruction
> set extensions and v
adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've activated the echo command (also the pause command) which it is
> equivalent to the echo command... and have done some tests:
The problem is in the parser.
> grub> pause fjfjl
> fjfjl
> grub> pause "fjfjl"
> fjfjl
> grub> pause -n \n
> error: Interna
"Jerone Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will do the changes for the coding style (good point).
Do you want me to wait with the review until you did this? At first
sight I noticed a few GCS related issues.
Is this code completely up-to-date with the draft on the wiki?
I do not mind getting
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As suggested by Marco, I adapted the framework to generate grub_init_all
> / grub_fini_all functions from grub-emu to also be used on grub-probe and
> grub-setup.
>
> Any comments on the patch?
Two comments on the changelog entry. If you can fix those,
Mikhail Vorozhtsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Here is a patch for booting GRUB via itself with multiboot
> module. Tested on [http://grub.enbug.org/TestingOnX86]-alike floppy
> image and QEMU.
Great!
> BTW. When I'm trying to add some code/data before/in multiboot_entry
> in startup.S, G
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bean,
> I have written a small problem to test my parse.y, to compile, use the
> following commands:
>
> bison -d -p grub_script_yy -b grub_script parser.y
> gcc -oparser parser.c lexer.c grub_script.tab.c
>
> After compilation, run parser
>
> ./parser
>
> Ju
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This update includes u2 and u2-1, and fix a small problem caused by u2-2.
Oh, I should've waited with the other reviews until I noticed this one.
> --
> Bean
>
> 2007-06-28 Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * kern/parser.c (state_transitions): Exit GRUB_PAR
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch fixes the following bugs:
>
> 1. Token parser
>
> echo aa"bb"cc
> old: aa"bb"
> new: aa"bb"cc
>
> set BB=1
> echo aa$BB
> old: aa 1
> new: aa1
>
> set BB=1
> echo ${BB}aa
> old: 1 aa
> new: 1aa
>
> set AA=1
> set BB=$AA
> echo $BB
> old: empty
> new:
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> Some bugs I found on scripting.
>>
>> 1. token parser
>>
>> echo aa"bb"
>> aabb
>> (correct)
>>
>> echo aa"bb"cc
>> aabb
>> (cc is lost)
>>
>> echo aa$prefix
>> aa (hd0,1)/boot/grub
>> (should be one to
Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
It has been a while since I had time to actively take part in the
discussion on this list and review patches. I am really sorry for
this. This patch had to wait quite a while, so I'll start with this.
It is great to have NTFS support so I'd like to integrat
Hi,
Would be nice if we could start using a BTS for grub2 issues. Is the Savannah
one suitable? Is it possible to have a separate cathegory for grub2 bugs?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you
THE PROBLEM
=
The problem about boot loaders in a multi distribution environment is
the grub configurations being overlapped.
Imagined this partition layout:
part 1: windows
part 2: ubuntu
part 3: debian
If you install first windows, th
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:16:16AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:26:27PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:10:52PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > What naming/numbering scheme does this follow when you add more disks?
> >
> > hd, hd1, hd2. Luck
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:31:02AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:26:43PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > What's the point of GRUB_IEEE1275_FLAG_NO_PARTITION_0 ? We have code that
> > > checks this flag, but
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:38:30AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 14 July 2007 15:02, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > Thank you for your replies. As my time is limited, I don't reply to
> > individual messages, but I have read all of them. In my understanding, all
> > long-term contri
32 matches
Mail list logo