On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:58:09 +0100
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Bean wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:02 PM, J. Bakshi
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:52:41 +0100
> >> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> J. Bakshi wrote:
> >>>
> On Wed, 28
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:14:33AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > >
> > > It appears that -nostdinc also excludes GCC internal header directory (for
> > > e.g. s
Am Samstag, den 14.11.2009, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:43:52PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 21:46 +0530 schrieb BVK:
> > >
> > >> Valgrind log is attached. It also reported invalid f
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Miletich wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > If he followed the instructions in http://grub.enbug.org/PXEBOOT it is
> > to be expected that GRUB only starts in rescue mode, because that's what
> > the selection of modu
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:35:29PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 13:12 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > and support for floppy
> > > > images.
> > >
> > > I didn't consider this critical, but I'm
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > I think the fastest way to make GRUB2 use gPXE's networking features
> > is to use both of them as they currently are. GRUB2 can be integrated
> > as a embedded image into gPXE. gPXE boots, does a DHCP requests,
> >
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 04:38:22PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Following code can check A20:
> > *((volatile grub_uint8_t *) 0x20) = 0;
> > *((volatile grub_uint8_t *) 0x30) = 1;
> > if (*((volatile grub_uint8_t *) 0x20))
> > grub_printf ("Expect bugs\n");
> > else
> > grub_prin
Thomas Miletich wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>
>> Hello, all. I'm currently importing gPXE into grub-extras to allow a
>> tighter interraction and integration. I would like to discuss
>> collaboration between our two projects.
>>
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 12:28:01AM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> 3) Add a secondary target to gPXE to produce series of GRUB modules. Due
> to big differences between build systems this may be problematic and
> result in frequent breakage
>From a distributor POV, option 3 is diffic
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:48:00PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'm wondering how come the i386-qemu port works if none of its
> > initialization code takes into account gate A20. Does this
> > mean it's supposed to be already disabled in initial CPU state
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:43:52PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2009, 21:46 +0530 schrieb BVK:
> >
> >> Valgrind log is attached. It also reported invalid free for the same place.
> >>
> >> BTW, valgrind is run as
> >>
> >> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix Zielcke a écrit :
> MBR would be (hd1) or (hd0) not (hd1,1)
>
> But maybe it's really like Vladimir thinks and Truecrypt loader and
> windows bootloader are different in this case.
>
If you have a 'pro' version of Windows Seven, you can give a
Am Samstag, den 14.11.2009, 13:22 +0100 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
> Felix Zielcke schrieb:
>
> > On launchpad someone made a bugreport where removing the search and
> > drivemap commands from the generated Win 7 menu entry by os-prober
> > breaks booting it.
> > So I removed drivemap command for Vis
Johannes Bauer wrote:
> >Did you try without drivemap?
>
>
> Yup. TrueCrypt immediately complains:
>
> TrueCrypt Boot Loader
> Loader Damaged! Use Rescue Disk: [blabla]
>
>
There are 2 kind of booters:
Type (a) always try to boot from first disk. They need drivemap.
Type (b) respect the disk
Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm wondering how come the i386-qemu port works if none of its
> initialization code takes into account gate A20. Does this
> mean it's supposed to be already disabled in initial CPU state,
> and only enabled by BIOS?
>
> Or maybe the code only works by chance and would brea
Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>
>>> And as they have two revision system, this make
>>> it difficult to track previous bug. For example, it's hard to tell
>>> which revision of grub-extra can compile with which main stream
>>> revision.
>>
Felix Zielcke schrieb:
> On launchpad someone made a bugreport where removing the search and
> drivemap commands from the generated Win 7 menu entry by os-prober
> breaks booting it.
> So I removed drivemap command for Vista and 7.
> It wouldn't make much sense if the search line would break it.
Duboucher Thomas schrieb:
> I suggest chainloading from bootmgr to Grub2, instead of the opposite.
> You should give a try and it's not difficult to do.
Actually, I'd rather not. The reason for this is that the Linux hard
drive is my productive drive and the Windows is only of secondary use
I'm wondering how come the i386-qemu port works if none of its
initialization code takes into account gate A20. Does this
mean it's supposed to be already disabled in initial CPU state,
and only enabled by BIOS?
Or maybe the code only works by chance and would break unexpectedly
in specific situ
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
>> And as they have two revision system, this make
>> it difficult to track previous bug. For example, it's hard to tell
>> which revision of grub-extra can compile with which main stream
>> revision.
> It's always latest-to-lat
20 matches
Mail list logo
