Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 20:03 +0100 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> Simon Wagner wrote:
> > Hello dear GRUB2 developers,
> >
> > I am a user of Ubuntu 9.10, which uses GRUB2 1.97. Unfortunately
> GRUB
> > needs a rather long time loading the modules. For 2 minutes or so it
> > just dis
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:59:09AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:13:55AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > +#define _(str) gettext(str)
>
> And I'm not sure if this is the right place to define _. Isn't there
> a system-wide definition?
It's traditional to define _ in ea
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:13:55AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> +po/messages.pot: po/POTFILES
> + xgettext --from-code=utf-8 --keyword=_ -f $< -o $@
> +
> +po/*.po: po/messages.pot
> + msgmerge -U $@ po/messages.pot
> +
> +po/%.mo: po/%.po
> + $(MKDIR_P) $$(dirname $@)
> + msgfmt -
Hi,
This is to announce that, following approval from RMS, the header in
GRUB 2 that contains Multiboot declarations (multiboot.h) is now being
distributed under the X11 license in latest Bazaar trunk of GNU GRUB.
With this change, we expect make it easier for OS kernel developers
and implemento
I wrote initial support for gettext in build system. It is available in:
sftp://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/srv/bzr/grub/people/robertmh/gettext/
also attached. It probably still needs some polish, please comment.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decid
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:36:05AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > I just interested to know if the menu system is already there in grub2. My
> > box is debian. Hope in a week I'll get the modification during package
> > up-gradation.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> B
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> I just interested to know if the menu system is already there in grub2. My
> box is debian. Hope in a week I'll get the modification during package
> up-gradation.
Vladimir is currently reviewing Colin's work, and we expect that it will
be mer
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> I just interested to know if the menu system is already there in grub2. My
> box is debian. Hope in a week I'll get the modification during package
> up-gradation.
Hi,
Binary package is only available for ubuntu karmic, although
installation
Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2009, 13:32 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:50:39PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > $ srcdir=$PWD builddir=$PWD gcc -isystem=$srcdir/include
> > > > -I$srcdir/include -I$builddir -I$builddir/include test.c -o test && ls
> > > > test
> > > > test
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:50:39PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > $ srcdir=$PWD builddir=$PWD gcc -isystem=$srcdir/include
> > > -I$srcdir/include -I$builddir -I$builddir/include test.c -o test && ls
> > > test
> > > test
> > > $ srcdir=$PWD builddir=$PWD gcc -nostdinc -isystem $(gcc
> > > -p
Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2009, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:17:50PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >
> > The advantage is that this does exatly what we want for the target.
> > Remove /usr/include from the include search directories but still keep
> > the gcc interna
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:17:50PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> The advantage is that this does exatly what we want for the target.
> Remove /usr/include from the include search directories but still keep
> the gcc internal one for e.g. stdarg.h
> As far as I understand the gcc manual, isystem
Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2009, 12:12 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:04:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to the hin
Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2009, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > >
> > > Thanks to the hint from rubisher I looked now at Linux Makefiles.
> > > They use this:
> >
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:04:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > >
> > > Thanks to the hint from rubisher I looked now at Linux Makefiles.
> > > They use this:
> >
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:11:31PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 14.11.2009, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:43:52PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> > > Why are all handlers are removed on normal.mod unload? If user e.g.
> > > rel
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> >
> > Thanks to the hint from rubisher I looked now at Linux Makefiles.
> > They use this:
> >
> > NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name
17 matches
Mail list logo
