gbura...@gmail.com wrote:
>> It may be a recent regression because we have a reports of successful
>> boot in such configuration
>> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-05/msg00179.html and
>> neighbour threads).
>> Be sure that grub is compiled with -mcmodel=large. You can also try
>
Hi,
2010/4/21 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko :
> Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> Where possible, I currently use the EDID information to determine the
>> physical size of the monitor (e.g. "520 mm wide and 320 mm high"), and
>> then scale font data, etc to suit; so that everything is the same
>>
> It may be a recent regression because we have a reports of successful
> boot in such configuration
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-05/msg00179.html and
> neighbour threads).
> Be sure that grub is compiled with -mcmodel=large. You can also try
> disable usage of >4GiB memory
Great that somebody agrees with me on the GUIDs =)
In you have problems with compile/testing, feel free to reply here (or to my
mail directly). I ahave made some fixes to it.
Again, I am talking about integration it to the GRUB. This is MUST HAVE
feature, at least for UEFI support
--
This mess
Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
>
>> In Febryary I was testing GRUB for UEFI and noticed that it was simply
>> crashing.
>>
>> See topic
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-02/msg0.html
>>
>> At that time I blamed incorrect UEFI implementation on tha
Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> I currently use "PC speaker" as my "critical error notification
>>> method" - it's about 15 instructions that use I/O ports only and
>>> doesn't require memory allocations or anything else. I doubt setting
>>> keyboard LEDs (for a PS/2 keyboard) would be much larger or re
Hello, all. On i386 multiboot requires for paging to be disabled and on
amd64 it will be required to map P=V so physical and virtual adresses
are the same. However on MIPS it's inadequate to ask for bootloader to
set such a mode because to do so one would need to go into mode with TLB
activated and
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
> In Febryary I was testing GRUB for UEFI and noticed that it was simply
> crashing.
>
> See topic
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-02/msg0.html
>
> At that time I blamed incorrect UEFI implementation on that computer (cause
> it wo
Hi,
Quoting gbura...@gmail.com, who wrote the following on Wed, 21 Apr 2010:
In Febryary I was testing GRUB for UEFI and noticed that it was simply crashing.
See topic
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-02/msg0.html
At that time I blamed incorrect UEFI implementation on tha
gbura...@gmail.com wrote:
> In Febryary I was testing GRUB for UEFI and noticed that it was simply
> crashing.
>
> See topic
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-02/msg0.html
>
> At that time I blamed incorrect UEFI implementation on that computer (cause
> it worked fine on ano
In Febryary I was testing GRUB for UEFI and noticed that it was simply crashing.
See topic
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2010-02/msg0.html
At that time I blamed incorrect UEFI implementation on that computer (cause it
worked fine on another one), but now I noticed that when I
11 matches
Mail list logo
