Hi folks,
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux "squeeze/sid" with Linux
2.6.32-5-686-bigmem were my two harddisks are configured in Software
RAID (aka faikraid).
Because faikraid did not work for me especialy since udev version 158
where /dev/mapper/pdc_* are symlinked to /dev/dm-* nodes I tried
myself in c
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:27:01PM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 12:12 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > This is supported upstream on a number of architectures, for example
> > the PowerPC configuration option is:
>
> Then I'm ok with your patch but I'm on wack
On 07/14/2010 02:39 PM, Chinces Diana wrote:
First of all HTML e-mail are annoying and bad netiquette. Please adjust
your mailer
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We would be very interested in replacing elilo (the current Itanium
> boot loader) with grub.
>
>
>
> Could you help us with answ
Hi, Diana.
First of all, the Multiboot specification doesn't (yet) support Itanium and
that
is definetely something that needs work before we can say that GRUB has full
support for this architecture. What do you mean by network chainloading, how do
you expect to boot loader to behave exactly?
Hi all,
We would be very interested in replacing elilo (the current Itanium boot
loader) with grub.
Could you help us with answering a few questions about this boot loader?
1. Can you tell us if this type of architecture is supported or will be
supported?
2. Is th
On 07/14/2010 05:23 AM, Jason Butler wrote:
> Here is a patch to have configure --help print the build instructions for
> grub-emu
>
>
I'm fine with the principle. However in your patch the syntax of help
message seems unclear for me. Is it 2 sentences? If it's the same
sentence as the punctuat
On 07/13/2010 12:12 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Is building as ET_DYN supported upstream? We previously had reports of
>> building system of some distros to be plainly borked and usualy the
>> distro fixed their building system pretty fast. If upstream supports
>> ET_DYN, then this p
On 07/13/2010 11:53 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
I mean that the files we need are below the limit but some parts of
partition are above the limit. It will work the current boot but will
break in the future.
I see.
Go ahead for trunk.
Thanks, I committed the patch.
Gr
