I am "he" for your information.
Don't expect anything from "she", sir.
- Original Message
From: "ehem+g...@m5p.com"
To: The development of GNU GRUB
Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 12:07:44 PM
Subject: Re: Small PIC Fixes
>From: Vladimir '?-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> On 01/05/2011 06:58 AM
>From: Vladimir '?-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> On 01/05/2011 06:58 AM, ehem+g...@m5p.com wrote:
> > Perhaps not the biggest deal, but I do like to get low-hanging fixes out
> > of the way if they appear.
> >
> > One very significant item I found. It appears GCC is fine with %rbx being
> > clobbere
On 10/31/2009 06:01 PM, Ron wrote:
> This entry fails silently and when the commands were executed one by one
> the linux command shows the error message "error: invalid magic number".
>
>
This can be caused by BIOS cutting last sectors of the disk to make it
appear to have C/H/S geometry of som
Please test the attached patch
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
=== modified file 'util/grub-setup.c'
--- util/grub-setup.c 2010-11-26 21:03:16 +
+++ util/grub-setup.c 2011-01-05 10:48:40 +
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
#include
#include "progname.h"
#include
+#include
#defi
Thanks BVK!
:)
-Gnana
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:46 PM, BVK Chaitanya wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Gnanasekar Loganathan
> wrote:
>> Please find the attachment.
>>
>> grub version 1.98
>>
>
> Please use bzr version, which is, 1.99~beta Its been already fixed.
>
>
>
> bvk.chaitany
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Gnanasekar Loganathan
wrote:
> Please find the attachment.
>
> grub version 1.98
>
Please use bzr version, which is, 1.99~beta Its been already fixed.
bvk.chaitanya
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http
Please find the attachment.
grub version 1.98
I'm getting the same error 'unkown command'.
If you need any information please revert back to me.
I found alternate way of running those kind variables.
Thanks,
Gnana
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011
On 01/05/2011 06:58 AM, ehem+g...@m5p.com wrote:
> Perhaps not the biggest deal, but I do like to get low-hanging fixes out
> of the way if they appear.
>
> One very significant item I found. It appears GCC is fine with %rbx being
> clobbered when building PIC in 64-bit mode, even though it has pro
