Try using the command:
grub-install --target=x86_64-efi --efi-directory=root efi directory,
eg. /boot/efi
Thank you Aaron
With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and not
necessarily booted in EFI mode).
It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the
В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 12:46 +0800, Michael Chang пишет:
2012/9/25 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Пн., 24/09/2012 в 11:37 +0200, Mads Kiilerich пишет:
On 09/24/2012 08:51 AM, Michael Chang wrote:
We don't insert gettext module if message catalog file missing to
prevent error
On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and not
necessarily booted in EFI mode).
It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the same (eg it
could guess the 32/64 architecture, and set
2012/9/25 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any parameter, and
not necessarily booted in EFI mode).
It would be nice (for retrocompatibility) if 2.00 could do the same (eg it
В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 19:24 +0400, Andrey Borzenkov пишет:
В Вт., 25/09/2012 в 12:46 +0800, Michael Chang пишет:
2012/9/25 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com:
В Пн., 24/09/2012 в 11:37 +0200, Mads Kiilerich пишет:
On 09/24/2012 08:51 AM, Michael Chang wrote:
We don't insert gettext
Hi,
Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00? There is code
in tftp.c that stalls TFTP responses if = 50 packets are queued by the
network driver. That packet count is increased by one each time
grub_net_put_packet is called and decreased by one each time
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:51:49PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
We don't insert gettext module if message catalog file missing to
prevent error message from being logged.
I already posted a patch against the gettext module itself with a
similar rationale, which I think is a better place for
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:46:15PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
I agree with you. IMHO the problem is it's not emitted directly from
gettext module but from common underlying fs level, removing it would
lead to other message which is fatal be ignored as well.
That's incorrect; the gettext
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:09:16PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00?
It would have been extremely hard to do that by mistake, and I'm quite
confident that I didn't. All our patches are done by explicit *.patch
files in the debian/patches/
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:06:46PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I observe that grub-mknetdir works fine as a non-privileged user.
Making it an administrator-only tool by placing it in /usr/sbin/
seems like it encourages people to update their tftp server
directories as root, when they
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:04:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
It's a reasonable argument, yes. If we do this, I think it should be
upstream, as in the following patch. What do folks on grub-devel think?
Oops, forgotten ChangeLog entry:
2012-09-25 Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com
*
On 09/25/2012 03:09 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00?
no, i don't think so. the tarball that debian's 2.00-5 package i used
has this sha1 sum:
274d91e96b56a5b9dd0a07accff69dbb6dfb596b ../grub2_2.00.orig.tar.xz
which is the same as the
12 matches
Mail list logo
