On 25.09.2012 20:42, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/25 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
mailto:li...@colorremedies.com
On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com
mailto:yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
With 1.99, i only had to use 'grub-install' (without any
On 26.09.2012 00:06, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:04:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
It's a reasonable argument, yes. If we do this, I think it should be
upstream, as in the following patch. What do folks on grub-devel think?
Oops, forgotten ChangeLog entry:
On 26.09.2012 05:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/25/2012 03:09 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Is it possible that debian mismerged some changes from 2.00?
no, i don't think so. the tarball that debian's 2.00-5 package i used
has this sha1 sum:
274d91e96b56a5b9dd0a07accff69dbb6dfb596b
2012/9/26 Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:46:15PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
I agree with you. IMHO the problem is it's not emitted directly from
gettext module but from common underlying fs level, removing it would
lead to other message which is fatal be ignored
1) why does 'grub-install' (without any parameter) work for Ubuntu12.04
(grub1.99) ?
Probably because your kernel doesn't handle EFI properly so grub-install
wasn't able to detect it (/sys/firmware/efi was missing).
Hi Vladimir
- here is an example where /sys/firmware/efi is not missing:
On 26.09.2012 10:07, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote:
1) why does 'grub-install' (without any parameter) work for
Ubuntu12.04
(grub1.99) ?
Probably because your kernel doesn't handle EFI properly so grub-install
wasn't able to detect it (/sys/firmware/efi was missing).
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:30:45AM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
AFAIR it has an endianness bug in tftp code (which was mainly tested on
ppc). Please try bzr.
Yes, that just occurred to me too. :-) I'll backport that patch,
thanks.
(Do we have a 2.01 plan of any kind
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:44:31PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
The error message and number are staging in the buffer and it's up to
the module to use grub_print_error (...) to flush all pending messages
to the screen. Nevertheless you could stack errors with push|pop,
which is extremely
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:30:45AM +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
AFAIR it has an endianness bug in tftp code (which was mainly tested on
ppc). Please try bzr.
Nifty. So endianess bugs can happen both ways. And here I thought us
big endian users were always the ones
On Sep 26, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
grub-install --help
I'll argue --help is not a manual, and the results on this point are confusing.
The GRUB2 manual is devoid of useful UEFI information, actually it doesn't
mention UEFI at all, and the parts that
On 26.09.2012 18:54, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is clear. What I specify will have /grub2/ (this is Fedora) added-on.
--efi-directory=DIR use DIR as the EFI System Partition root.
This makes no sense. On the one hand it's indicating that grub.efi ends up
precisely in the location I
On Sep 26, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
No. It just means that DIR has to be the ESP mountpoint. IT doesn't
imply anything about where the .efi effectively lands.
That's the problem. The help for --boot-directory makes it clear where it will
land. The entry
В Ср., 26/09/2012 в 12:08 -0600, Chris Murphy пишет:
On Sep 26, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
No. It just means that DIR has to be the ESP mountpoint. IT doesn't
imply anything about where the .efi effectively lands.
That's the problem. The help for
On Sep 26, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
One problem is, where it lands depends on whether it is removable
install or not and whether distributor is set or not. How you describe
it in single help line? It rather belongs to grub documentation.
It would be useful in the --help
On 26.09.2012 20:39, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 26, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
One problem is, where it lands depends on whether it is removable
install or not and whether distributor is set or not. How you describe
it in single help line? It rather belongs to grub
On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
It's an empty discussion since I have no time to write this doc and
nobody else proposed himself to do it. Until this changes this
discussion has no point.
You have no time to write a doc you're admitting needs
On 26.09.2012 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
It's an empty discussion since I have no time to write this doc and
nobody else proposed himself to do it. Until this changes this
discussion has no point.
You have no
17 matches
Mail list logo
