Confirmed working, nice work.
Michael
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Go ahead
> On 03.02.2015 22:30, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> GCC 4.9 also generates R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC and R_ARM_THM_MOVT_ABS,
>> as an alternative to ABS32.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: L
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Are these two equivalent, or identical? And if so, which is preferred?
>
> grub2-install --no-bootsector
> grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true
>
Yes, they are equivalent. --no-bootsector is preferred for new usage.
http://git.savannah.gnu.
We are seeing grub network errors ("couldn't send network packet")
with UEFI PXE over an Emulex CNA. Debugging turned out that the
TX code path was running in a timeout waiting for the "recycle
buffer" to be returned. Time had an influence on this effect:
the menu and all required modules loaded us
Go ahead
On 03.02.2015 22:30, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> GCC 4.9 also generates R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC and R_ARM_THM_MOVT_ABS,
> as an alternative to ABS32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
> ---
> grub-core/kern/arm/dl.c| 15 +++
> grub-core/kern/arm/dl_helper.c | 39
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 01:10:02PM +0100, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
> What I almost forgot is that you need the following patch to fix
> compilation with O2/O3(it fixes warnings):
I can verify that this patch works, and makes it possible to compile
with gcc 4.9 at -O3 (so is effectively a prerequi
GCC 4.9 also generates R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC and R_ARM_THM_MOVT_ABS,
as an alternative to ABS32.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
---
grub-core/kern/arm/dl.c| 15 +++
grub-core/kern/arm/dl_helper.c | 39 +++
include/grub/arm/reloc.h | 5
Are these two equivalent, or identical? And if so, which is preferred?
grub2-install --no-bootsector
grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true
Thanks,
--
Chris Murphy
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 05:01:32PM -0500, David Michael wrote:
>> >> There was some interest on help-grub about supporting SMBIOS access
>> >> upstream. I've updated the module I wrote a while ago to work with
>> >> current GRUB and added doc
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 02:26 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2015 12:09 PM, David Michael wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 02/01/2015 09:05 PM, David Michael wrote:
> * grub-core/commands/i3
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 10:02:09AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
> > /* Save the Multiboot info struct (after relocation) for later
> > use. */
> > mov $sym_phys(cpu0_stack)+1024,%esp
> > -push%ebx
> > -callreloc
> > +
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:49AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
> > - xen.efi build will not so strongly depend
> > on a given GCC and binutils version.
>
> While I can see the possibility of making the binutils version
> dependency go away (by manually creati
Hello everybody.
Now GSoC 2015 is going to start at February, 9 and Grub website has a
“Summer of code” link on its main page [1], but it states to be updated
on 2012/01/05, which is quite a lot ago. So I've checked the Git repo
and found that LUKS and fancy menus seem to be already implemented. W
On 02/02/2015 02:26 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2015 12:09 PM, David Michael wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2015 09:05 PM, David Michael wrote:
* grub-core/commands/i386/smbios.c: New file.
* grub-core/Makefile.core.def (smbi
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:38:06PM +0100, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
> I guess with "get in touch offline" you mean via IM?
Email is fine.
Or I'm leiflindholm on #freenode.
> What kind of setup annoys you? The repo is compile-able outside my
> build system.
The problem is that your repo was creat
Hi,
I guess with "get in touch offline" you mean via IM?
What kind of setup annoys you? The repo is compile-able outside my build system.
I guess this is related to picking the new features, because the bug I
reported should be reproduce-able with the mainline branch(u should
get the error at runt
Hi Michael,
Sorry for delay - travelling back from FOSDEM, then catching up on
work.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:26:58AM +0100, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
> I reverted his commits and compiled using O3 and it worked, but: I get
> the same error on runtime:
>
> relocation 0x2f is not implemented ye
>>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/reloc.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/reloc.c
> @@ -33,9 +33,10 @@ asm (
> typedef unsigned int u32;
> #include "../../../include/xen/multiboot.h"
>
> -static void *reloc_mbi_struct(void *old, unsigned int bytes)
> +static u32 alloc_struct
>>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
> /* Save the Multiboot info struct (after relocation) for later use.
> */
> mov $sym_phys(cpu0_stack)+1024,%esp
> -push%ebx
> -callreloc
> +mov %ecx,%eax
> +push%ebx/* Multiboot
18 matches
Mail list logo
