The kernel bzImage payload length appears to be incorrectly minus by 4 when
trying to grub_file_offset_open for the uncompressed vmlinux image. If gzip
used as compressor it will lead to the file->size read from offset of crc32
instead of the uncompressed image size.
[1]
http://www.onicos.com/staf
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Two nitpicks otherwise looks good. Thanks!
Thanks for reviewing these again. I agree with your suggestions, but
do they warrant another updated patch, or can those changes just be
squashed onto this commit?
Also, since sending this, Leif
> -Original Message-
> From: grub-devel-bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel-
> bounces+elliott=hp@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Leif Lindholm
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:14 PM
> To: grub-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] disk: read into cache directly
>
> From: Andr
I found a bug in the 'grub_f2fs_read_file' function.
It fails when the file position is not 0. to fix it:
- grub_memcpy (buf + pos, inline_addr + pos, len);
+ grub_memcpy (buf, inline_addr + pos, len);
Michael
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> ACK from my side
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs
> that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id
> set to 2.02.
> Statistics: [1]
> Search (with loads of f
29.02.2016 15:36, David Michael пишет:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:12 PM, David Michael wrote:
>> This adds the GUID and includes it in the lsefisystab module.
>
> Pinging to check if these two can make it into 2.02.
Fine from my side.
>
> Side note: I was trying a CoreOS snapshot the other d
Currently multiboot2 protocol loads image exactly at address specified in
ELF or multiboot2 header. This solution works quite well on legacy BIOS
platforms. It is possible because memory regions are placed at predictable
addresses (though I was not able to find any spec which says that it is
strong
Add grub_relocator64_efi relocator. It will be used on EFI 64-bit platforms
when multiboot2 compatible image requests MULTIBOOT_TAG_TYPE_EFI_BS. Relocator
will set lower parts of %rax and %rbx accordingly to multiboot2 specification.
On the other hand processor mode, just before jumping into loaded
Hi,
This patch series:
- enables EFI boot services usage in loaded images
by multiboot2 protocol,
- add support for multiboot2 protocol compatible
relocatable images.
Earlier versions of this patch series are extensively tested
and used internally at least in Oracle. It should be ment
Do not pass memory maps to image if it asked for EFI boot services.
Main reason for not providing maps is because they will likely be
invalid. We do a few allocations after filling them, e.g. for relocator
needs. Usually we do not care as we would already finish boot services.
If we keep boot servi
Add tags used to pass ImageHandle to loaded image if requested.
It is used by at least ExitBootServices() function.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
---
v3 - suggestions/fixes:
- mbi EFI related stuff size calculation
should depend on target architecture
(suggested by Konrad Rzeszutek Wil
Two nitpicks otherwise looks good. Thanks!
20.02.2016 22:12, David Michael пишет:
...
> diff --git a/grub-core/commands/smbios.c b/grub-core/commands/smbios.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..80a01a3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/grub-core/commands/smbios.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
> +/* smbios.c - r
Interesting idea. It seems to be actually used by openSUSE ARM maintainers.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/253414
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:43:07PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 02/03/16 10:12, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 29/02/16 10:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>> On 25/02/16 19:33, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 22.02.2016 16:14, Juergen G
On 02/03/16 10:12, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/02/16 10:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 25/02/16 19:33, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
22.02.2016 16:14, Juergen Gross пишет:
> On 22/02/16 13:48, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> On Mon, F
>
> onsider files
> > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz
> > and signature at
> > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-2.02~beta3.tar.xz.sig
>
> Thanks, this is a great step. What is the timeline we're planning to
> follow?
>
> I started a separate thread to collect pending tasks.
Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs
that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id
set to 2.02.
Statistics: [1]
Search (with loads of false positives unfortunately): [2]
Not every bug there is a release blocker, for some of them i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:46:52AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 02.03.2016 03:14, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> > Implement a driver-specific malloc function that allocates a buffer
> > with the alignment specified by grub_efi_block_io_media structure.
> > ---
> > grub-core/disk/efi/efidisk.c | 8 +++
Fixed. Thank you for reporting
Le Tue, Mar 1, 2016 à 11:14 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> My mistake. I'm going to fix it
>
> Le mar. 1 mars 2016 20:10, Andrei Borzenkov a
> écrit :
>
>> 29.02.2016 11:16, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>> > On Sunday, Fe
Le Wed, Mar 2, 2016 à 4:46 AM, Andrei Borzenkov a
écrit :
> 02.03.2016 03:22, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> > Is there any way this patch reclaims unused memory in case of partial
> cache
> > eviction?
>
> Not yet, I wanted to make sure base looks sane first. Are there any
> cases of par
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 02/03/16 08:56, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:55:09AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
> >> mapping. This capability is flagged by an elf-
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29/02/16 10:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 25/02/16 19:33, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >> 22.02.2016 16:14, Juergen Gross пишет:
> >>> On 22/02/16 13:48, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:30:30PM +0100, Juergen G
On 02/03/16 08:56, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:55:09AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Modern pvops linux kernels support an initrd not covered by the initial
>> mapping. This capability is flagged by an elf-note.
>>
>> In case the elf-note is set by the kernel don't place the i
23 matches
Mail list logo
