On 19/10/18 13:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> +
>> + __arg0 = a0;
>> + __arg1 = a1;
>> + __arg2 = a2;
>> + __arg3 = a3;
>> + __arg4 = a4;
>> + asm volatile ("call *%[callno]"
>> +: "=r" (__res), "+r" (__arg0), "+r" (__ar
On 30/01/15 17:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> ..because it is ignored by Xen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/boot/reloc.c |1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/boot/reloc.c b/xen/arch/
On 30/01/15 17:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Create generic alloc and copy functions. We need
> separate tools for memory allocation and copy to
> provide multiboot2 protocol support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> xen/arch/x8
Kiper
I have not reviewed the multiboot2 protocol in detail, but it appears
sane and I presume it is suitably tested and works.
As far as the mb1/mb2 interaction goes, this is looking far better.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile|3 +-
>
On 30/01/15 17:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S | 174
> +++--
> xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h | 29 +++
> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 23 ++---
> xen/arch/x86/x86_64/asm-offsets.c
On 30/01/2015 23:43, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:06:53PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 30/01/15 17:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> +
>>> +efi_multiboot2_proto:
>>> +/* Skip Multiboot2 information fixed part */
>>>
On 03/02/2015 17:14, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:49AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
>>> - xen.efi build will not so strongly depend
>>> on a given GCC and binutils version.
>> While I can see the possibility of making the binutils versio
On 04/02/15 09:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.02.15 at 10:04, wrote:
>> On 03/02/2015 17:14, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:49AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
> - xen.efi build will not so strongly depend
> on a given GCC an
On 10/02/2015 21:27, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S | 174
>> +++--
>> xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h | 29 +++
>> xen/arch/x8
On 27/03/15 11:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.03.15 at 12:14, wrote:
IIRC, MS ABI is supported starting from GCC v4.0.
Where did you find that? From all I know __attribute__((__ms_abi__))
is being supported only by 4.5 and newer. The mere support of the
MS ABI via command line option doesn't hel
On 27/03/15 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.03.15 at 14:32, wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote:
We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check
for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support
mult
On 14/08/15 11:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.08.15 at 21:22, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:17:48PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:03PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
@@ -34,6 +57,42 @@ multiboot1_header_start: /*** MULTIBOOT1 HEADER /
.l
On 24/08/15 21:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> Currently, PE file contains many sections which are not "linear" (one
> after another without any holes) or even do not have representation
> in a file (e.g. BSS). In theory there is a chance that we could build
> proper PE file using curre
On 27/08/15 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.15 at 17:10, wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:12:38AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
/* Copy bootstrap trampoline to low memory, below 1MB. */
-mov $sym_phys(trampoline_start),%es
On 28/08/15 07:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> Therefore I am very much +1 get grub working.
> Then you kind of misunderstood: I'm not against getting grub2
> working (i.e. patches prior to this one are fine in principle). What
> I'm against is hacking around firmware+grub2 combinations not
> suitable
On 12/11/15 15:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.11.15 at 14:41, wrote:
>> Hello, all. I'd like to have set of commands that would boot xen on all
>> platforms. I thought of following set:
>>
>> xen_hypervisor FILE XEN_OPTIONS
>> xen_kernel FILE KERNEL_OPTIONS
>> xen_initrd INITRD INITRD INITRD
>>
On 22/01/16 12:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir & grub-devel,
>>
>> Do you have any thoughts on this issue with i386 pv-grub2?
>>
> Is it still an issue? If so I'll try to replicate it. From stack dump I
> see that it has jum
On 22/01/16 13:08, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 14:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 22/01/16 12:56, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> On 22.09.2015 10:53, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>> Hi Vladimir &
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multiboot.texi
> index 4b92918..27e5a2f 100644
> --- a/doc/multiboot.texi
> +++ b/doc/multiboot.te
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi | 20
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multiboot.texi
> index 27e5a2f..a7e3584 100644
> --- a/doc/multiboot.texi
> +
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi | 108
> +++-
> doc/multiboot2.h |2 +
> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multiboot
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi | 56
>
> doc/multiboot2.h | 24 ++
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multi
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multiboot.texi
> index f1e0e09..c81b2ea 100644
> --- a/doc/multiboot.texi
> +++ b/doc/multiboot.texi
>
On 09/06/2016 21:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> ---
> doc/multiboot.texi | 17 +
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/multiboot.texi b/doc/multiboot.texi
> index c81b2ea..bf02a1b 100644
> --- a/doc/multiboot.texi
> +++ b/doc/multiboot.
On 02/05/17 08:06, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
>
> This patch adds the support of xen_boot command for aarch64:
> xen_hypervisor
> xen_module
> These two commands are only for aarch64, since it has its own protocol and
> commands to boot xen hypervisor and Dom0, but not multibo
On 05/05/17 09:57, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 4 May 2017 at 04:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 May 2017, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 02/05/17 08:06, fu@linaro.org wrote:
>>>> From: Fu Wei
>>>>
>>>>
On 28/10/13 18:06, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Hello, all. I'm working on pvgrub2 and my problem is following:
> When you first use grant tables you commit yourself to a particular
> grant table version. GRUB has to read from disk and hence use grant
> tables. By doing so it comm
On 26/11/13 18:12, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:58:47 +0100
> Fabio Fantoni пишет:
>
>> I have also another question:
>> Is possible specify multiple path where search the grub.cfg for support
>> all mainly distributions and add a custom cfg path support taking it
>> from argu
On 30/03/2021 19:28, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> seems like I've run into an issue with multiboot2 and module2
> commands that I can't quite explain. Since it may be something
> super simply and silly -- I wanted to reach out here before I do
> a GRUB/Xen/LK source deepdive.
>
> So here's the
On 01/04/2021 09:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> And the obvious next question: is my EVE usecase esoteric enough that
>>> I should just go ahead and do a custom GRUB patch or is there a mo
On 06/04/2021 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.04.2021 21:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 01/04/2021 09:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 01.04.2021 03:06, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>>
On 06/04/2021 19:03, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:51 AM Andrew Cooper
> mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/04/2021 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 01.04.2021 21:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 01/04/
32 matches
Mail list logo
