Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-12-01 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 02.12.2011 07:22, Keshav P R wrote: 2011/11/29 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > On 29.11.2011 08:25, Keshav P R wrote: grubx64.efi is installed at /boot/efi/efi/grub2/grubx64.efi , but the modules are located at /boot/grub (which is $grub

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-12-01 Thread Keshav P R
2011/11/29 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko > On 29.11.2011 08:25, Keshav P R wrote: > >> grubx64.efi is installed at /boot/efi/efi/grub2/grubx64.**efi , but the >> modules are located at /boot/grub (which is $grubdir aka prefix set in >> grubx64.efi/core.efi). But this again creates confus

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-29 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 29.11.2011 08:25, Keshav P R wrote: grubx64.efi is installed at /boot/efi/efi/grub2/grubx64.efi , but the modules are located at /boot/grub (which is $grubdir aka prefix set in grubx64.efi/core.efi). But this again creates confusion for some users who have to find out the "actual" prefix di

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-29 Thread Seth Goldberg
Hi, I do think it's important to support installation of the efi boot application in one place but modules (prefix) in another. That scenario makes sense, at least, for oses that store the prefix on redundant file systems/abstractions. --S On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Keshav P R wrote:

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Keshav P R
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:04, Seth Goldberg wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > On 28.11.2011 14:25, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> Hello all. Based on the information from > http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend t

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Seth Goldberg
On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On 28.11.2011 14:25, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> Hello all. Based on the information from >> http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend to add support for such >> install. It requires a small HFS

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Seth Goldberg
Hi, I *REALLY* REALLY like the grub-install changes -- I was about to propose the --efi-directory option myself! THe rest of the code looks ok to me. --S On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > ___ Grub-deve

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 28.11.2011 14:25, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: Hello all. Based on the information from http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend to add support for such install. It requires a small HFS+ volume mounted at /boot/mactel. I also simplify handling of EFI directories by addi

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 28.11.2011 15:27, Mads Kiilerich wrote: On 11/28/2011 02:25 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: Hello all. Based on the information from http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend to add support for such install. It requires a small HFS+ volume mounted at /boot/mactel. I also

Re: [PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 11/28/2011 02:25 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: Hello all. Based on the information from http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend to add support for such install. It requires a small HFS+ volume mounted at /boot/mactel. I also simplify handling of EFI directories by add

[PATCH, RFC, RFT] Mactel integration

2011-11-28 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Hello all. Based on the information from http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/7468.html I intend to add support for such install. It requires a small HFS+ volume mounted at /boot/mactel. I also simplify handling of EFI directories by adding explicit option to specify it and removing some "compatibility"