On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 5:25 AM Glenn Washburn
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:02:03 -0400
> Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
>
> > Ah thanks, I sent them in two separate emails with git format-patch,
> > hopefully correctly?
>
> I'm confused git format-patch does not send anything, that would be git
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:02:03 -0400
Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> Ah thanks, I sent them in two separate emails with git format-patch,
> hopefully correctly?
I'm confused git format-patch does not send anything, that would be git
send-email. I don't see any recent patches from you on the list, so I
Ah thanks, I sent them in two separate emails with git format-patch,
hopefully correctly?
Patrick
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 7:13 PM Glenn Washburn
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:10:16 -0500
> Glenn Washburn wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:00:19 -0500
> > Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:10:16 -0500
Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:00:19 -0500
> Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
>
> > Thankfully, no further changes were actually necessary, so here is my
> > attempt to convert it to two patches
> >
> > I attached the diffs, but also committed them t
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:00:19 -0500
Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> Thankfully, no further changes were actually necessary, so here is my
> attempt to convert it to two patches
>
> I attached the diffs, but also committed them to
> https://github.com/byteit101/grub2/tree/grub-lvmintegrity
I saw your
Thankfully, no further changes were actually necessary, so here is my
attempt to convert it to two patches
I attached the diffs, but also committed them to
https://github.com/byteit101/grub2/tree/grub-lvmintegrity
Patrick
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:06 PM Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:52:37PM -0500, Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> Hmm, what would the logical parts be? The solution for both cachevol and
> integrity is the same.
It seems to me at least code refactoring which you are doing could be
taken out to a separate patch. Maybe something else... Anywa
Hmm, what would the logical parts be? The solution for both cachevol and
integrity is the same.
I do know another part needs to be added as I still need to investigate
some warnings, but I'll likely need to do that this weekend when I have
some more time.
Patric
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM D
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 04:37:30PM -0500, Patrick Plenefisch wrote:
> In an effort to solve
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061168
> for myself, I implemented basic support for cachevol and integrity volumes in
> LVM.
>
> This is just an extension of the cachepool support that
In an effort to solve
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061168 for myself, I
implemented basic support for cachevol and integrity volumes in LVM.
This is just an extension of the cachepool support that already existed,
and just like that support, I ignore all of the metadata and j
10 matches
Mail list logo
