comitted
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> 2009/8/23 Robert Millan :
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>>> wrote:
+ for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
+
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/8/23 Robert Millan :
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>> wrote:
>>> + for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
>>> + {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < width; i++)
>>> + {
>>
>> It's a bit odd, but GC
2009/8/23 Robert Millan :
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> + for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
>> + {
>> + for (i = 0; i < width; i++)
>> + {
>
> It's a bit odd, but GCC doesn't seem to optimize those in a single loop.
> Could
> you us
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 01:05:45PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> >> + for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
> >> + {
> >> + for (i = 0; i
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> + for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
>> + {
>> + for (i = 0; i < width; i++)
>> + {
>
> It's a bit odd, but GCC doesn't seem to optimize those in a si
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:33:30PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> + for (j = 0; j < height; j++)
> +{
> + for (i = 0; i < width; i++)
> +{
It's a bit odd, but GCC doesn't seem to optimize those in a single loop. Could
you use "i = 0; i < height * width; i++" inste
Hello. Glyphs are 1-bit bitmaps and when they are blitted currently
generic and slow blitter is used. This patch adds optimised blitters
and this make text rendering faster
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git
diff --git a/Change
