Hi Julien,
Thanks a lot for the very detailed report!
On 29.04.19 19:35, Julien ROBIN wrote:
>
> Seems that this patch is a step forward for arm-efi (32 bits), and
> doesn't affect others EFI targets (arm64-efi, i386-efi and x86_64-efi
> are still working fine, including the aarch64-laptop). So i
Seems that this patch is a step forward for arm-efi (32 bits), and
doesn't affect others EFI targets (arm64-efi, i386-efi and x86_64-efi
are still working fine, including the aarch64-laptop). So it's
definitely better than nothing. However, for arm-efi (32 bits), as
opposed to the previously su
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:55:42AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The arm relocation code has a manual special case for EFI binaries to
> add the natural alignment to its own relocation awareness.
>
> Since commit a51f953f4ee87 ("mkimage: Align efi sections on 4k
> boundary") we changed that alignm
The arm relocation code has a manual special case for EFI binaries to
add the natural alignment to its own relocation awareness.
Since commit a51f953f4ee87 ("mkimage: Align efi sections on 4k
boundary") we changed that alignment from 0x400 to 0x1000 bytes. Reflect
the change in that branch that we
