03.04.2017 11:59, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017, 06:43 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
>> sblock was local and so considered new variable on every loop
>> iteration.
>>
>> While on it, dynamically allocate buffer to reduce stack usage.
>>
> Looks good. Did you check all in
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017, 06:43 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> sblock was local and so considered new variable on every loop
> iteration.
>
> While on it, dynamically allocate buffer to reduce stack usage.
>
Looks good. Did you check all instances sizeof, so we don't have sizeof of
pointer?
Did you check
sblock was local and so considered new variable on every loop
iteration.
While on it, dynamically allocate buffer to reduce stack usage.
Closes: 50597
---
grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-cor
