On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 05:22:22PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:37:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > > wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 05:22:22PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:37:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:37:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 01:48:30PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > > wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:21:39AM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 01:48:30PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:38:22PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 01:48:30PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:38:22PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:12:28PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > > wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 01:48:30PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:38:22PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:12:28PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel
> > wrote:
> > > The zstd support in btrfs brings significant size increment to
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:38:22PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:12:28PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> > The zstd support in btrfs brings significant size increment to the
> > on-disk image that it can no longer fit into btrfs bootloader area and
> > short
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:12:28PM +0800, Michael Chang via Grub-devel wrote:
> The zstd support in btrfs brings significant size increment to the
> on-disk image that it can no longer fit into btrfs bootloader area and
> short mbr gap.
>
> In order to support grub update on outstanding i386-pc
The zstd support in btrfs brings significant size increment to the
on-disk image that it can no longer fit into btrfs bootloader area and
short mbr gap.
In order to support grub update on outstanding i386-pc setup with these
size constraints remain in place, here we build the zstd suppprt of
