On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> 1) deleting files fails because of .svn directories
> 2) One of the hunks for configure.ac was rejected.
> 3) Is there any reason for keeping following line:
> HELP2MAN = help2man
> 4) version is still wrong.
> 5) It
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Isaac
Dupree wrote:
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
8) COPYING contains GPLv2. fdl.texi isn't imported.
I'm not a lawyer but following is my analysis
AFAICT only example kernel is under GPL (v2 to be precise) the rest i
Am Montag, den 24.08.2009, 20:52 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> > If we have any, then it doesn't fall within the Debian Free
> > Software Guidelines and Debian et al. will be annoyed and not distribute it
> > as much.
> Actually this doesn't matter. GRUB is GNU project and invarian
> If we have any, then it doesn't fall within the Debian Free
> Software Guidelines and Debian et al. will be annoyed and not distribute it
> as much.
Actually this doesn't matter. GRUB is GNU project and invariant
sections and cover texts are completely ok. Additionally it's a coder
manual so it's
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Isaac
Dupree wrote:
> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>>
>>> 8) COPYING contains GPLv2. fdl.texi isn't imported.
>>
>> I'm not a lawyer but following is my analysis
>> AFAICT only example kernel is under GPL (v2 to be precise) the rest is
>> either custom lice
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
8) COPYING contains GPLv2. fdl.texi isn't imported.
I'm not a lawyer but following is my analysis
AFAICT only example kernel is under GPL (v2 to be precise) the rest is
either custom license, unclaimed copyright or non-copyrightable.
IMO multiboot specificati
> 8) COPYING contains GPLv2. fdl.texi isn't imported.
I'm not a lawyer but following is my analysis
AFAICT only example kernel is under GPL (v2 to be precise) the rest is
either custom license, unclaimed copyright or non-copyrightable.
IMO multiboot specification should be FDL with cover text "Mult
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:56:09PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Au
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:56:09PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Au
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>> > wrote:
>> >> This is a d
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > wrote:
> >> This is a dirty import of multiboot specification from grub1. It
> >> d
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> This is a dirty import of multiboot specification from grub1. It
>> doesn't compile it unless explicitly requested since we don't have
>> appropriate autoconf te
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:46PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> This is a dirty import of multiboot specification from grub1. It
> doesn't compile it unless explicitly requested since we don't have
> appropriate autoconf tests yet. The main goal is to leave no current
> documentati
13 matches
Mail list logo
