On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 02:46:59PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:18 PM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:42PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
> > > a.out binaries. The
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:18 PM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:42PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
> > a.out binaries. The presence of the address header tag determines
> > how the bootloader tries
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:07:42PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
> a.out binaries. The presence of the address header tag determines
> how the bootloader tries to interpret the binary (a.out if the address
> tag is present
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:24:31PM +, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > >>> In
On 14.03.2024 15:24, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> In addition to the existing address and ELF
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> >>> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
> >>> optional
On 14.03.2024 10:30, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
>>> optional PE binary load type. This new type is a useful addition since
>>>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:24 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
> > optional PE binary load type. This new type is a useful addition since
> > PE binaries can be signed and verified (i.e.
Please take this discussion to a separate thread. In this thread it's
pure offtopic
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:25 AM Jan Beulich via Grub-devel
wrote:
>
> On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
> > optional PE binary
Hi, I saw this on the list and have concerns:
Original Message
On 14 Mar 2024, 6:24 pm, Jan Beulich via Grub-devel < grub-devel@gnu.org> wrote:
On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
>> optional PE
On 13.03.2024 16:07, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> In addition to the existing address and ELF load types, specify a new
> optional PE binary load type. This new type is a useful addition since
> PE binaries can be signed and verified (i.e. used with Secure Boot).
And the consideration to have ELF
Currently, multiboot2-compatible bootloaders can load ELF binaries and
a.out binaries. The presence of the address header tag determines
how the bootloader tries to interpret the binary (a.out if the address
tag is present else ELF).
Add a new load type header tag that explicitly states the type
12 matches
Mail list logo
