On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:55:26AM +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Daniel Axtens writes:
>
> > This is 'belt and braces' with the last fix: we end up trying to use
> > too much memory in situations like corrupted Linux software raid setups
> > purporting to usew a huge number of disks. Simply refuse
Daniel Axtens writes:
> This is 'belt and braces' with the last fix: we end up trying to use
> too much memory in situations like corrupted Linux software raid setups
> purporting to usew a huge number of disks. Simply refuse to permit such
> configurations.
>
> 1024 is a bit arbitrary, yes, and
This is 'belt and braces' with the last fix: we end up trying to use
too much memory in situations like corrupted Linux software raid setups
purporting to usew a huge number of disks. Simply refuse to permit such
configurations.
1024 is a bit arbitrary, yes, and I feel a bit like I'm tempting fate