Hi,
At Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:12:52 +0200,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Committed. One question:
Thank you!
+ .reserved_first_sector = 1,
This line claims that overwriting first sector of nilfs won't destroy any
data or metadata. Is it so?
Oh, that is the one I copied
Committed. One question:
+ .reserved_first_sector = 1,
This line claims that overwriting first sector of nilfs won't destroy any data
or metadata. Is it so?
Jiro SEKIBA wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much for the comments!
I revised the patch to reflect the comments.
+{
+
Hi,
Thank you very much for the comments!
I revised the patch to reflect the comments.
+ {
+ grub_error(GRUB_ERR_BAD_FS,btree corruption\n);
+ return -1;
+ }
What do you think about possible fallback to iterate over all nodes in case
of fs corruption?
The case that
Jiro SEKIBA wrote:
Hi,
This is a revised patch to support nilfs2, a log file system.
The patch is basically just a retrofit of the one I sent before
against current tree.
I've checked it both on qemu and qemu-system-ppc with grub-fstest.
Thanks for your effort.
I recommend running
