"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are
>> there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to
>> subscribe only lists.
>
> This might be
On Sunday 16 December 2007 12:02, Robert Millan wrote:
> Another question is, how will we do context reply for patches? The BTS
> doesn't seem to easily allow this. Maybe we could followup on our replies
> via bug-grub ? But a problem with that is that it'll be hard to see th
On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are
> there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to
> subscribe only lists.
This might be the third time to say this, but...
help-grub is already
#x27;t free of downtimes or problems. I mean, there are
community development places like Savannah, Gna! or Alioth only based on
trac.
But don't make me wrong, I'm not personally interested in this at all, I
was just making sure the suggestion did get to the right people. Now
that tne BTS
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:22:44PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >>>> - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
> >>>> should we adjust t
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>>>> - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
>>>> should we adjust that to make them use the BTS?
>>> Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
> > > should we adjust that to make them use the BTS?
> >
> > Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version info what is grub le
use
> > much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply.
> >
> > Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff.
> >
> > Two thoughts:
> >
> > - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
> > should we adj
Robert Millan wrote:
> The creature has been seized:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
>
> I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse
> much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply.
>
> Finally the BTS is u
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:37, Robert Millan wrote:
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
No problem for me.
Okuji
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
>
> Did anyone comment on the trac-based solution I mentioned? If someone
> did, I missed it, sorry.
No, the reaction to from Okuji was tha
The creature has been seized:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse
much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply.
Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff.
Two thoughts:
- Th
gt; I think Okuji makes valid points. How about using the tracker in savannah?
>
> It's certainly better than using the mailing list as a bug tracker ;-)
Even if we decide to switch to trac in the future, the BTS in savannah is
rotting right now and needs a serious cleanup.
--
Robert
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
Did anyone comment on the trac-based solution I mentioned? If someone
did, I missed it, sorry.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 12, 2007 10:37 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
>
This is a very good idea, many old items are inappropriate anyway.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://
No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to overhaul the GRUB BTS in Savannah so that it can be used to
> track bugs in (or feature requests for) GRUB 2.
>
> What I propose to
Hi!
I'd like to overhaul the GRUB BTS in Savannah so that it can be used to
track bugs in (or feature requests for) GRUB 2.
What I propose to do is review all bugs, and:
- If the bug is obviously specific to GRUB Legacy, close it.
- If the bug was found in GRUB Legacy, but might app
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Would be nice if we could start using a BTS for grub2 issues. Is the Savannah
> one suitable? Is it possible to have a separate cathegory for grub2 bugs?
There was a discussion about this before in de thread "Status u
Hi,
Would be nice if we could start using a BTS for grub2 issues. Is the Savannah
one suitable? Is it possible to have a separate cathegory for grub2 bugs?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get
19 matches
Mail list logo
