Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2008-01-23 Thread Marco Gerards
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: >> grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are >> there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to >> subscribe only lists. > > This might be

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Sunday 16 December 2007 12:02, Robert Millan wrote: > Another question is, how will we do context reply for patches? The BTS > doesn't seem to easily allow this. Maybe we could followup on our replies > via bug-grub ? But a problem with that is that it'll be hard to see the > full context of

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are > there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to > subscribe only lists. This might be the third time to say this, but... help-grub is already

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:22:44PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel, > should we adjust that to make them use the BTS? > >>> Yes.

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel, should we adjust that to make them use the BTS? >>> Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version info what is grub legacy) >>> there s

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel, > > > should we adjust that to make them use the BTS? > > > > Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version info what is grub legacy) > > there should be note th

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:27:03PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: > > The creature has been seized: > > > > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub > > > > I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse > > much of GRUB Legacy's and they will

Re: BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-16 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Robert Millan wrote: > The creature has been seized: > > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub > > I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse > much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply. > > Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff. >

BTS for GRUB 2 (Re: BTS overhaul)

2007-12-15 Thread Robert Millan
The creature has been seized: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply. Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff. Two thoughts: - The website still